Editor، محررون، recentchangescleanup
١٬٢٢٢
تعديل
←جرم الخطأ المتعمد بالتعريف العنصري
| [مراجعة منقحة] | [مراجعة منقحة] |
| سطر ٢٩٢: | سطر ٢٩٢: | ||
I said: What if I [Sahnun, being a criminal] slandered a man and then that man [the victim] left Islam, thereafter returned to Islam, and then demanded of [i.e. against] me the hadd [that it should be imparted against Sahnun] - Would you smite [i.e. lash] me for him or not? | I said: What if I [Sahnun, being a criminal] slandered a man and then that man [the victim] left Islam, thereafter returned to Islam, and then demanded of [i.e. against] me the hadd [that it should be imparted against Sahnun] - Would you smite [i.e. lash] me for him or not? | ||
He said: There is no hadd upon his [the revert’s] slanderer [i.e. the criminal]. | He said: There is no hadd upon his [the revert’s] slanderer [i.e. the criminal]. | ||
He, Ibn al-Qasim, said: If he [the criminal] slandered him, and then he [the criminal] left Islam, or if he [the criminal] slandered him while he [the criminal] was an apostate [''murtad''], then the hadd would be implemented against him [the criminal] while he [the criminal] was an apostate – and if he [the criminal] repented [i.e. returned to Islam], then the hadd would be implemented against him [the criminal] just as well. And if someone [being a criminal] slandered him [the victim] while he [the victim] was an apostate, and then he [the victim] repented, then there would be no hadd upon him [the criminal]. And if someone [being a criminal] slandered him [the victim] before he [the victim] apostatized, and then he [the victim] apostatized, then there is no hadd upon the slanderer [i.e. the criminal] if he [the victim] repents [i.e. returns to Islam] – and indeed this is similar to the case of a man who was slandered with [the accusation of] ''zina'' [fornication/adultery] but was not taken thus for the hadd [i.e. not punished or prosecuted] until he [the victim] [actually] committed ''zina'' [fornication/adultery], for then [also] there is no hadd upon whoever slandered him.}}{{Quote|[https://shamela.ws/book/1753/617#p1 كتاب الشفا بتعريف حقوق المصطفى لأبو الفضل القاضي عياض بن موسى اليحصبي]| | He, Ibn al-Qasim, said: If he [the criminal] slandered him, and then he [the criminal] left Islam, or if he [the criminal] slandered him while he [the criminal] was an apostate [''murtad''], then the hadd would be implemented against him [the criminal] while he [the criminal] was an apostate – and if he [the criminal] repented [i.e. returned to Islam], then the hadd would be implemented against him [the criminal] just as well. And if someone [being a criminal] slandered him [the victim] while he [the victim] was an apostate, and then he [the victim] repented, then there would be no hadd upon him [the criminal]. And if someone [being a criminal] slandered him [the victim] before he [the victim] apostatized, and then he [the victim] apostatized, then there is no hadd upon the slanderer [i.e. the criminal] if he [the victim] repents [i.e. returns to Islam] – and indeed this is similar to the case of a man who was slandered with [the accusation of] ''zina'' [fornication/adultery] but was not taken thus for the hadd [i.e. not punished or prosecuted] until he [the victim] [actually] committed ''zina'' [fornication/adultery], for then [also] there is no hadd upon whoever slandered him.}}{{Quote|[https://shamela.ws/book/1753/617#p1 كتاب الشفا بتعريف حقوق المصطفى لأبو الفضل القاضي عياض بن موسى اليحصبي]|وَقَال أَحْمَد بن أَبِي سُلَيْمَان صاحب سحنون: من قال إن النبي صلى الله عَلَيْه وَسَلَّم أسْوَد قتل. | ||
}} | }} | ||